The cost of a membership has been $5.00 USD per month since its conception, and any additional costs are influenced by the third-parties used to handle the transactions. The premium fee attached to membership is $5.00 United States Dollars (USD) per month when paying with a credit card, $6.99 USD per month when paying by phone, or $7.95 USD per month when using the services of Payb圜ash.com. This feature of RuneScape is referred to as Pay-to-play, or P2p.
Runescape screenie thread upgrade#
"Players are allowed to upgrade their account status to "Members" status, and can then gain access to a plethora of new features which over time, have become more numerous than what is offered to players of free status. here is the current text, with problematic sections identified: this will need to be severely rewritten before this article is going anywhere beyond a "B" article. The membership section is taking shape now, but is looking more like an advertisment that an enclyclopedic section. Exarion 00:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC) membership- advertisment I added those, examples should be given when possible, but i am going to agree with you and say they need to be reformatted, as its even looking like an advertisment. I removed the specifics, revert if I shouldn't have- JCGracik talk c 18:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC) "Membership status allows players to explore their own part of the RuneScape world, which has since become the majority of the map, dozens of new quests to embark on, such as Recipe for Disaster, new skills to tackle, like fletching, new items to be had, like the dragon spear, various mini-games to pass the time, such as Castle Wars, and other minor, yet numerous additions." I think that this sentence is important to the article, but everything I put in bold above seems like fancruft to me (is a non-player going to care about members being able to do Recipe for Disaster?) Mamyles 21:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC) fancruft? It doesn't matter why its at the top this is an encyclopedia, not a website-rating organization. RuneHQ is at the top due to the quality of their guides, and the amount of organization in their users and staff. Agentscott00 ( talk) 04:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) RuneHQ is a much cleaner, stronger, and better community.
If you have a legitimate argument for why it should be replaced, feel free to make it here, but "simply because there are other sites" isn't good enough to include more. RuneHQ has been decided on as it is the most popular, and it has relatively good information on the game. I think RuneHQ shouldn't be the top fansite simply because there are other sites like tip.it/runescape that give just as much information if not mare than Rune HQ -The preceding unsigned comment was added by Davud363000 ( talk Remember, they have to pass the rigorous inspection of not being a game guide, being verifiable and representing all sides equally and fairly, so no weasel wording would be allowed. Recent Articles for Deletion - Since we're trying to improve the quality of this Wiki, we must get rid of the fancruft from the sub-categories.To put it plainly, your edits are more likely to be appreciated there. For those of you who get your edits reverted with such nonsense explanations like "cruft" or "linkspam" or whatever, you might want to check out the RuneScape Wiki. RuneScape Wiki - Ok, I'm advertising the RuneScape Wiki, but it's probably a good idea.For more information on this, plase click here. is the lowest-placed (most often visited) by Alexa rank and is therefore listed. The method that contributors believe is the most effective is by Alexa ranking. As fan sites all offer similar information, an effective measurement must be made to decide which is the most appropriate to list. Fansites- Wikipedia's external links guideline is that one major fansite may be included as an external link.This rule applies to all articles in the RuneScape Series. Spelling- RuneScape is a British Game and uses British spelling, so British Spelling must be used.30 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape community.28 The Criticism section - please participate in discussion.20 Merge Delete Merge Delete Merge Delete.15 RuneScape Wikipedia Page: Biased and/or non factual?.14 Image- Can we try to get it in somewhere? (Or something similar).9 history and development- own article?.7 Recruiting member for the WikiProject RuneScape.
0 kommentar(er)
